Education and learning issues paper
Education and learning issues paper


Education and learning is a key area of inquiry for – the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse,
Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability – (the Royal Commission). It represents both a setting for violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation and an important component of a society that seeks
inclusion for people with disability. This issues paper has been adapted from
a background paper that was prepared – for an education and learning workshop that took place on on 3 October 2019 with representatives – from community and disability organisations
and education academics. The paper: 1st: Summarises two approaches which provide the foundation for the Royal Commission’s consideration – of education and learning in Section 1. 2nd: Outlines the Royal Commission’s preliminary understanding of some of the key issues and barriers – faced by people with disability in realising
their right to education in Section 2. 3rd: Discusses the Royal Commission’s Terms of Reference in the context of education and learning in Section 3. Several questions are included in Section 3 to assist people wishing to provide contributions – to the Royal Commission
on the matter of education and learning. The Letters Patent require the Royal Commission to – take a human rights-based approach and an intersectional approach to its inquiry. This is sign ‘Intersectional’, which I will use this sign
for Disability Royal Commission videos – instead of fingerspelling ‘Intersectional’ every time. This word: ‘Intersectional’ is signed that way. It means people that are influenced by
experiences associated with age, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation,
intersex status, and ethnic origin or race. so their own experiences are vastly different. For instance, if an
unfortunate situation occurred to four of them, perhaps one won’t be affected as much as other, where the other would be
extremely upset and another one, angry – and each individuals will response in a different way because of their intersectional backgrounds. An intersectional approach takes into
account the combination of forms of oppression, hierarchies and power structures which
interact in such a way that they are inseparable – and expose people to unique experiences
of disadvantage and discrimination. The Royal Commission may
also have regard to other approaches, including a life course perspective that examines people’s lives, structural contexts and social change. The Letters Patent establishing the Royal Commission recognise that people with disability – disability have the right to the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms – and that Australia has international
obligations to take appropriate legislative, administrative and other measures to promote the human rights of people with disability – under the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (CRPD). The right to education is well established in
international human rights law. The CRPD reaffirms and clarifies the right to education for people with disability, with Article 24 requiring States to ensure an inclusive education system at all levels. The understanding of Article 24
is guided by the general principles and the cross-cutting obligations of the CRPD, including Article 7 on children with disability. In 2016, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD Committee), released General Comment No.4
on the right to inclusive education, which sets out the CRPD Committee’s interpretation of Article 24 and provides guidance on its implementation. The CRPD Committee
has explained that inclusive education involves: ‘a process of systemic reform embodying changes and modifications in content, teaching methods, approaches, structures and strategies in education to overcome barriers with a vision serving to provide all students of – the relevant age range with an equitable and participatory learning experience – and the environment that best corresponds
to their requirements and preferences.’ The CRPD Committee also
distinguished inclusive education from – integration and segregation. Integration is the – ‘process of placing persons with disabilities in
existing mainstream education institutions – with the understanding that they can adjust to the standardized requirements of such institutions.’ Segregation occurs – ‘when the education of students with disabilities is provided in separate environments designed or used to – respond to a particular impairment
or to various impairments, in isolation from students without disabilities.’ The Letters Patent require
the Royal Commission to consider – the multi-layered experiences
of people with disability that are influenced – by experiences associated with age, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation,
intersex status, and ethnic origin or race. The Royal Commission must have
regard to the particular situation of – First Nations people with disability and culturally and linguistically diverse people with disability. This section provides an outline of some of the – key issues and barriers experienced
by students with disability, based on preliminary research
and review of past reports and inquiries, as well as information gathered from the Royal Commission’s previous workshops. Many of the issues overlap and are interrelated. The Royal Commission will consider systemic and structural factors that cut across the issues and barriers, such as policy frameworks, funding and data collection. We welcome comment on additional issues and barriers not yet identified. People with disability may experience physical and environmental barriers in accessing education. Buildings, education materials and communication methods and tools may be inaccessible. For example, textbooks and online materials may not be in accessible formats and languages. These barriers are often more pronounced for students in regional, rural and remote areas. Students with disability in early childhood education face many of the same issues – and barriers present
in primary and secondary education. We welcome
contributions on how these issues and barriers – present in the context of early childhood education, as well as any unique issues and barriers. Literature suggests that teachers, management and others in some early childhood – settings discriminate against children with disability and seem to readily exclude them. This highlights that
children with disability and their families – often have to deal with an education system that is not set up to cater for all, and this often leads to experiences of prejudice, exclusion and discrimination
from the very beginning of learning. Gatekeeping refers to the formal denial of access or – informal discouragement of children with disability attending their school of choice. This could include refusing to enrol a child with disability, only offering part-time hours, encouraging enrolment in segregated education settings or encouraging home-schooling. Research suggests
significant levels of gatekeeping across Australia. All States and Territories allow for exemptions to compulsory schooling of children, and some States and Territories allow for ‘flexible’ or ‘special’ arrangements for students. These provisions allow a child with disability to attend primary or secondary school on a part-time basis. There is a lack of consistent national data – on the number of students with disability
who attend school part-time. Over the last decade,
the segregation of children with disability – in special education units/classes or
‘special’ schools has increased. Students with autism have been disproportionately affected by this increase in segregation. First Nations students with disability are also disproportionately over-represented in special schools. Students with disability
may be excluded from school activities, such as excursions, assemblies, sports carnivals and other school activities. This is likely to negatively
impact on educational attainment – as well as an
individual’s sense of belonging and community. There is a lack of consistent national data on the suspension and expulsion of students with disability. Available data and
research suggests that children with disability – experience higher rates of
suspension and expulsion from schools. The ‘inherent requirements’ of
many university courses, technical, vocational – or further education programs may exclude students with disability from these levels of education. Inherent requirements
specify the essential requirements – that a person must
have in order to participate in the course, for example. an ability to complete
tasks that involve fine motor skills. There is considerable variation
between the inherent requirements- for the same courses across education providers. The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) – and Disability Standards for Education 2005
(Education Standards) – require education providers to make reasonable adjustments to assist students with disability – to participate in education
on the same basis as other students. However, students with disability do not always receive the adjustments they require to participate in learning. Past reviews of the
Education Standards have recommended the – development of guidance documents to support consistent implementation of reasonable adjustments. In addition to reasonable adjustments, students with disability
may require individualised support measures – to fully and effectively participate in learning. The Education Standards do not mandate nor provide guidance on the provision of individualised supports. They also do not address
individualised or personalised learning plans. Transition between
stages of education often represent periods – when additional supports may be required to ensure an effective and smooth transition. Education curricula may not allow teachers flexibility – to design education and learning for
the variety of student learning needs. Currently, Australia does not have a national approach to modifying curricula for students with disability. Inclusive education requires respect for diversity, including cultural diversity. The Education Standards
do not directly address the intersectional – nature of the barriers
some students with disability experience, including First Nations students and culturally and linguistically diverse students with disability. The capability and skills of school staff,
particularly teachers, are critical to providing students with disability with quality and inclusive education. However, there are concerns that many teachers
do not receive appropriate education – or training to enable them to provide inclusive education. Approaches to responding to and addressing behaviours of concern are often inappropriate and ineffective, as demonstrated by the use of restrictive practices (discussed in Section 3) – and the high rates of suspension and expulsion. Good practice models for responding to behaviours of concern and supporting students with disability – emphasise the need for holistic, proactive, preventative and trauma-informed approaches. People with disability may be subject to many forms of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation – in education and learning environments. The Royal Commission will
consider the nature and extent of – violence, abuse,
neglect and exploitation in education and learning, and inquire into whether particular forms of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation are more prevalent. Attachment A sets out the Royal Commission’s working definitions of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation. Violence and abuse include the use of constraints, restrictive practices and seclusion. Violence and abuse also
include humiliation and harassment, and significant violations of
dignity on a systemic or individual basis. Neglect can be a
single significant incident or a systemic issue that involves depriving a person with disability of the basic necessities of life, including education. Previous inquiries have highlighted the prevalence of bullying and harassment of students with disability. Research and inquiries also suggest that restraints and seclusion continue to be used in Australian schools, despite calls for these to end. Are particular forms of
violence, abuse, neglect or exploitation – more prevalent in education and learning environments? Does the extent or nature of violence, abuse, neglect or exploitation of people with disability vary between: Stages of education and learning (i.e. early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, further education)? Settings of education and learning
(i.e. inclusive, integrated or segregated)? States or Territories Government, Catholic or
Independent education systems? Taking an intersectional approach,
how do the specific experiences of – violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation vary amongst students in education and learning environments? What are some of the underlying causes of the issues and barriers (outlined in Section 2)? How do these issues and
barriers link to or influence the experiences of – violence, abuse, neglect or exploitation by people with disability in education and learning environments? What measures and mechanisms prevent
violence, abuse, exploitation and neglect – of students with disability in education and learning environments? What role does or could inclusive education play – in preventing violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation in society? Do you have any experiences that
illustrate any of these matters? Particular cases of violence, abuse, neglect or exploitation in education and learning – can be brought to the Commission’s attention by making a submission via the Commission’s website. The Royal Commission will explore the adequacy of: (i) the mechanisms available to students with disability and their parents or guardians to identify, disclose and report instances of
violence, abuse, neglect or exploitation; (ii) the procedures for investigation; and – iii) responses to instances of violence, abuse, exploitation and neglect of students with disability. What barriers or impediments are
there to identifying, disclosing and reporting – violence, abuse, neglect
or exploitation in education and learning settings? What barriers or
impediments are there to adequately investigating – violence, abuse, neglect
or exploitation in education and learning settings? Are there good practice examples that encourage reporting, effective investigation – and responses to violence, abuse, neglect or exploitation in education and learning settings? Education has been characterised as a
‘bridging’ or ‘multiplier’ right, enabling individuals
to benefit from and claim other rights, such as those related to work, housing,
political participation and access to justice. The Royal Commission will consider the link between inclusive education and an inclusive society, which supports
the independence of people with disability – and their right to live free from
violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation. Evidence suggests there is a link between inclusive education and social inclusion in the areas of education, employment and living in the community. Research also demonstrates there is
‘clear and consistent evidence – that inclusive education settings can confer – substantial short and long term benefits for
students with and without disabilities.’ What has prevented Australia from complying fully with is obligations in Article 24 of the CRPD? What needs to change within: Commonwealth, State and Territory governments, schools and communities, and individual classrooms, to ensure an
inclusive education system at all levels? What is essential to facilitate the transition
from segregated or integrated settings – to inclusive education settings,
and to sustain the change? What is the impact of inclusive education
on the life course outcomes – (including learning and employment outcomes)
of students with disability? And students without disability? How does inclusive education
promote a more inclusive society? Responses to this
issues paper should be provided either: electronically to – in writing to – We encourage responses as soon as possible in order – to inform the future work of the
Royal Commission on education issues. Please indicate if you consent to
your responses being made public on our website. The Royal Commission has
provisionally defined key terms as follows: • Violence and abuse – include assault, sexual assault, constraints,
restrictive practices (physical and chemical), forced treatments, forced interventions,
humiliation and harassment, financial and economic abuse – and significant violations of privacy and
dignity on a systemic or individual basis. • Neglect – includes physical and emotional neglect,
passive neglect and wilful deprivation. Neglect can be a single significant incident or a systemic issue that involves depriving a person – with disability of the basic necessities of
life such as food, drink, shelter, access, mobility, clothing,
education, medical care and treatment. • Exploitation – means the improper use of
another person or the improper use of or withholding of another person’s
assets, labour, employment or resources- including taking physical,
sexual, financial or economic advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *